The Art of Deception Capaldi and Smith, 2007
page 27
3 rules for examining logic:
1. We do not identify premises and conclusions by content.
2. We do not identify premises and conclusions by position or location within a paragraph. For stylistic or other reasons, the premises and conclusions can appear anywhere.
3. The appearance of the following word or words at the beginning of a sentence or clause signifies that the sentence of clause is a conclusion: therefore, thus, so, hence, consequently, accordingly, it follows that, as a result, I conclude, and other synonymous terms.
This leads a read to use a little wariness when listening to or reading the statements of other people. The actual meaningful concepts can very easily be hid in a portion of the text or speech where one usually does not pay so much attention. This explains the potential danger of a statement "why are you still beating your wife?".
A single word can have enough underlying flavor as to cloud the end conclusion, making it far more powerful or dangerous than the end statement.
No comments:
Post a Comment